CPI Asia

Home Guest Columnists Koon Yew Yin Bumiputera contractors: A wasteful national mission to date
Bumiputera contractors: A wasteful national mission to date Print E-mail
Columnists
Written by Koon Yew Yin   
Wednesday, 18 November 2009 07:54
Share Link: Share Link: Bookmark Google Yahoo MyWeb Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Myspace Reddit Ma.gnolia Technorati Stumble Upon

It is an indictment of our system that IJM is able to compete internationally for contracts but yet is required to work as a sub-contractor to Bumiputera companies on the North-South Highway in Malaysia.

On Oct 25, 2009 our Second Finance Minister Ahmad Husni Mohamad Hanadzlah said that government has vowed to cut down on wasteful spending to lower its budget deficit and all major public projects must go through the open tender system.

Earlier, the Auditor-General’s report for 2008 revealed continuing financial management weaknesses at every level of the government. Delays in project completion seem to be a perennial problem and the lack of oversight by various ministries and departments in the procurement of goods and services continue to cost the government hundreds of millions of ringgit.

These statements indicate perhaps that our Prime Minister Najib Razak may want to reverse his announcement on January 9 in Kuala Teregganu that the government would always look after Class F contractors. (Non- Bumiputeras cannot register as a Class F contractor).

The government had in fact already set aside RM900 million, which was RM300 million more than last year, for works to be undertaken by Class F contractors this year.

Producing competitive Bumiputera contractors

As reported on May 1, 2005, Malaysia had one contractor for every 614 persons. Most likely there are more contractors by now. This ratio is again likely to be amongst the highest in the world and is obviously costing the public a significant amount of money besides affecting our overall economic performance.

I would like to pose a few questions which may appear unkind or insensitive but nonetheless need to be asked.

Out of hundreds of high-rise buildings in Kuala Lumpur does anyone know of any Bumiputera contractor who has won any of the building contracts through an open competitive tender process? Out of hundreds of kilometers of highway in Malaysia, can any Bumiputera contractor who won any part of the highway contracts through open tender be identified?

The answer to the above questions unfortunately is in the negative. The evidence is that all the government’s well-intentioned efforts in trying to produce competitive Bumiputera contractors since 1957 have failed.

Why this has happened needs to be openly discussed rather than swept under the carpet. In this note, I share my experiences as a contractor and my knowledge of why Bumiputera contractors have failed in the past and what needs to be done by the government to correct this unhealthy situation.

Facts of life in the contracting business

Contracting is a very difficult business yet it is so easy to register as a contractor.

To register as a Class F contractor one has only to show that he has RM5,000. He does not even require a pass in Lower Certificate of Education (LCE). But it will take at least 10 years to learn how to overcome all the inherent difficulties and become competitive and efficient. Continuously giving out lucrative and over-priced contracts without open tenders will only make the recipients less competitive.

Secondly, studies have shown that there are more failures and bankruptcies in contracting than in any other business, and also almost all construction projects are NOT completed within the original scheduled time.

The delay will cost the contractor more and that is why you can often see uncompleted buildings and abandoned projects which have been undertaken by inefficient contractors. There are many reasons for this peculiar phenomenon.

1. Open tender system

Although this system is the best way to ensure completion of any project/contract at the lowest price, it is the most difficult obstacle any contractor has to face in the real competitive world. He must know his business very well and be efficient to face the open competition all the time. Like a good athlete, he has to keep fit and constantly be aware of the market conditions and his competitors.

There is a classic saying, ‘a cheap thing is not good and a good thing is not cheap’. But contractors always have to produce good work at the cheapest price.

In order to submit the cheapest tender, the contractor must be very optimistic in all his assumptions to get the cheapest rates. He must assume that he will not encounter any cash flow difficulties and that he will always get his progress payments on time to pay his creditors.

He must also assume that he will not encounter any difficulty in getting all the required materials on time to avoid any delay and also that there are ample workers for him to pick and choose from.

Furthermore, he must also assume that the heavens will be kind to him and he will not meet any inclement weather during construction. Invariably, many of these assumptions are proven wrong and thus completion delayed, and the infrastructure will cost more to complete than provided for in the contract.

2. The importance of teamwork

Teamwork is important in all business endeavours. It is more so in the contracting business. Every contractor must realise that his success is not going to be determined by his own knowledge, talent or abilities. It is going to be determined by his ability to develop a great team. Those who are closest to him will help determine the level of his success.

Every efficient contractor must have a reliable team comprising managers, sub-contractors, material suppliers, foremen and skilled workers. All the team players must cooperate with one another, bearing in mind that the main contractor’s survival depends on their contribution. Their main goal must be saving cost. If they cannot complete the contract within the tender price, all of them will also be affected.

3. Construction material pricing

There was no material price escalation clause in the conditions of contract before I became the Secretary General of the Master Builders Association. During the unprecedented oil crisis, building material prices shot through the roof. As a result, many contractors could not complete their contracts for schools and other projects. After several appeals the Public Works Department (PWD), now known as Jabatan Kerja Raya (JKR), eventually allowed only cement and steel for price variation reimbursement.

This was only a partial solution as hundreds of other items were excluded.

Without a protective price fluctuation clause for the other items, contractors are exposed to risk. At the same time, knowing that they have to undercut their competitors during the tender process, contractors would normally under-price to achieve the lowest tender. Invariably, most materials would increase in price due to inflation and other reasons. Contractors require many years of experience to be able to anticipate such price changes and to make adequate provisions for them whilst at the same time not overpricing their tenders and losing the bid.

4. No contract is exactly the same

No two high-rise buildings in KL are the same.

Construction of a building, a bridge or a stadium is always akin to making a prototype. The process is much more difficult than manufacturing any product where there is repetition. For example in making cars, the first prototype and the initial few cars may be more difficult to make but once everyone gets used to the routine, the manufacturing process will normally proceed smoothly.

However, in the construction of buildings or any civil engineering works, there is very little repetitive work. Every construction site is different and most of the people involved have never worked together before.

On top of this, there may also be inexperienced supervisory staff that can create a lot of difficulties for the contractors. Invariably, by the time all parties get used to the routine, the scheduled time is over.

5. Financing

Most contractors do not have sufficient capital to finance their undertakings.

Contractors generally do not have fixed assets like most manufacturers. They usually do not have land and buildings but, instead, they have construction equipment. Unfortunately, banks do not accept these moving assets as collateral for a loan. Without bank financing, contractors will obviously find it more difficult to undertake their business.

Beginning at the bottom: The key to success

I have provided some insight into why contracting is not a business that is as easy or profitable as it is commonly perceived to be.

There are other factors explaining why or how some of the most successful tycoons associated with the building or construction industry have managed to get where they are.

Firstly, it should be noted that the majority of listed companies were started by Chinese merchants most of whom incidentally did not have tertiary education. For example, Lim Goh Tong of Genting began his working career as a scrap iron dealer and a contractor; and Yeoh Tiong Lay of YTL Corp. started off as a small contractor.

Generally, Bumiputeras are not interested in working long hours in managing small businesses earning marginal profit. Because of the NEP, many have hopes of securing permits or concessions for big deals so that they can become instant millionaires. There are relatively few Bumiputeras involved in small and medium-scale enterprises (SMEs).

More Bumiputeras should follow the humble footsteps of the Chinese to become traders and merchants for building materials and similar goods. The business skill they can learn from these humble beginnings will carry them a long way. I am very sure some of them will eventually become good contractors and successful businessmen if they learn the trade at the bottom and not try to parachute into the contracting business.

The importance of skilled workers

Although there are already many Bumiputera engineers unable to find employment, most of the universities are still producing more and more engineers every year. But without a sufficiently skilled workforce, all the engineers in the world would not be able to complete a single project.

There are so few Bumiputera construction foremen, carpenters and other skilled workers. If you were to go into any building construction site, you would see the truth of what I am saying. How many Malay carpenters have you seen in KL?

Without skilled Bumiputera workers, it would be more difficult for Bumiputera contractors to succeed. In fact, most of the Chinese contractors started as apprentices and rose from the bottom to become successful contractors. More Bumiputeras should be encouraged to work as apprentices in construction sites. This is a necessary good practice to produce really good Bumiputera contractors.

The role of trade schools

There should be more trade schools and more Bumiputeras should be encouraged to learn construction skills like carpentry, welding, plumbing, bricklaying, etc. Very soon, skilled tradesmen will be able to earn more than degree holders as is the case in Australia or England.

The government should build more trade schools and not hesitate to offer scholarships to Bumiputeras to be trained in these trade schools. Presently, the construction industry is not short of engineers but it is very short of skilled workers and supervisors. If more Bumiputeras are properly trained in various crafts and blue collar skills, some of them will go on to become good contractors.

Time and more time

They say Rome was not built in a day. It is easier to produce engineers, doctors and other professionals than to produce efficient and competitive contractors who do not need government financial aid. Just giving out lucrative contracts to Bumiputeras is not the answer; in fact it is counter-productive as it simply makes them more inefficient and less competitive.

IJM Corporation Bhd has taken more than 40 years to attain a competitive level of competence. The record shows that IJM has secured on competitive tenders five toll road concessions in India. Three are currently in operation and two are under construction. The total length of the roads exceeds 1,000 kilometres, longer than our North-South Highway.

In addition, IJM completed a toll bridge in Kolkata and sold its interest for RM65 million profit after a short period of three years. IJM is also a very reputable LRT builder, having to date completed 15km of the elevated sections of the New Delhi Metro and it was recently awarded another 8km.

Based on open competitive tender, IJM won the contract to build the tallest building, a prominent future landmark for the Delhi Municipality, in New Delhi.

It is an indictment of our system that IJM is able to compete internationally for contracts but yet is required to work as a sub-contractor to Bumiputera companies on the North-South Highway in our own country.

Conclusion: Half-baked contractors are not in our national interest

Contracting is one of the most, if not the most, difficult business and it takes a very long time to produce competent contractors.

It is very dangerous to quickly produce half-baked ones as they will soon find themselves in financial difficulties and require bailouts. The bankruptcy record shows that a large number of debtors are Bumiputera contractors with many of them unable to pay back the loans given by government-controlled financial institutions.

The government must change its methods and policies which have proven unworkable. There is no urgency in producing more Bumiputera contractors as many of the key industries e.g. the banks, plantations, motor vehicles, taxis, rice etc are already under the control of Bumiputeras.

Our government must not be narrowly communalistic and should make use of all the groups, irrespective of race, that are more efficient in the contracting business.

Giving out contracts without a full tender process is akin to corruption. I urge the government to stop this corrupt practice and to utilize the savings from these enormous sums to implement the options suggested above.

Note on the Author

I am a 76-year-old chartered civil engineer and one of the founders of the three larger construction companies listed in Bursa Malaysia. These are Gamuda Bhd, Mudajaya Group Bhd, and IJM Corporation Bhd.

I was a member of the Board of Engineers, Malaysia for three terms. I was also on the Sirim Board responsible in writing the Malaysian standard specifications for cement and concrete. In addition, I was the Secretary General of Master Builders Association, Malaysia for nine years.

These days, I am completely retired. My intention in writing this article is honourable. Many people may not like reading what I have written and the truth may be difficult to accept. Nevertheless, this is my considered analysis for the benefit of my country, the Bumiputera contractors and the construction industry.
Comments (76)
  • D'evil

    This is the most insightful article on the problems in contracting business in Malaysia. I hope the govt will take note.
    Otherwise, we keep throwing away good money.

  • shuib  - tolong hantar ke UMNO

    analisa amat penting. saya bersetugu dengan syor syor yang dicadangkan oleh Encil Koon.

    Sila kemukakan laporan ini kepada pemimpin UMNO

  • Az

    Indeed what you have articulated is true. It takes time, passing, hard work to succeed. There is just no shortcut.

    The rich bumiputera contactors (who happen to make it big) continue to rely on government hand outs (contracts). They seldom use their new found riches to develop their own chain of supply lines which will in turn make them more competitive and profitable in the open market. This is a mistake on their part.

    This can still be corrected. They think that their good fortune will never come to an end. They are being too optimistic. They are being irrational. They are unwise.

  • Sunny

    I totally agree with the writer, the government should spend the taxpayers money wisely not on Half-baked contractors

  • zali

    who control the followings
    1.raw material eg cement,sand,building material,rebar,formworks and others
    2.transportation eg lorry hantu, tipper
    3.electrical equipment
    4.machineries for construction
    5.big private construction companies including housing developer.
    how bumi can compete in open tender especially in smaller contracts eg class B to F if they already lose 10-20% on price difference from item listed above.
    pls note that many class A bumi company also have abang taiko non bumi behind them due to inabilty to compete directly because of different of pricing on raw material etc and also non favourable terms from the traders.
    Look at petroleum industry, there are many bumi co that really can compete not only in malaysia but globally because the raw material is not controlled by certain races.
    a lot of bumi's proffesional working behind big construction compony but there are mostly workhorse while non bumi will be promoted and the bumi proffesional will rot as workhorse only rarely beyond the management level.
    if you take out government job(even the percentage is very small compare to total construction industry volume)what is left to the bumi's. even when bumi contractors given the contract, they need to buy the materials from non bumi with inflated price of atleast 5-10% compare to the other race.so who is the real beneficiary in the system yet they still asking for more.
    How many non bumi carpenter left in construction industry. now most of them are indonesian.
    Will the non bumi company give the contracts say drainage works at housing estate to bumi contractor if the pricing between non bumi and bumi is the same.
    In few last big private project, how many actual sub contractors are bumi contractor. even with 30% ruling, in actual fact only less than 10% given to bumi contractors.IJM,YTL,Gamuda etc all have their pet Class A and bumi co to be used to fulfill the requirement.
    so when actually bumi contractors really can grow apart from the government contracts(even it was less than 30%)
    bumi control plantation? what a joke. who is Taiko, IOI, Mentakab etc?how many bumi selling plantation equipment,fertilizer etc?

  • Allan Wong  - Good analysis

    Good analysis, Mr Koon

    You lamented the poor performances of the Bumi contractors and engineers attributed to institutional racism. But you being a former member of Board of Engineers, Malaysia (BEM) just wonder how did you pass those Bumi Engineers who underperformed or unqualified and yet now they having P.Eng at the back of their names ?

    If you are honourable, principle and qualified as you put it , how did these engineers became Professional Engineers or P. Eng when you were in BEM or IEM??

    Isn't that a sore point in your career when you see newly built bridges , stadium roofs collapsing ? with IR and P.Eng that you have participated in granting ?

    Look here, Malaysian engineers are not well sought after overseas because they lacked qualifications and their P.Eng were obtained by just an interview. The civil engineers do not know how to design to earthquake codes of other countries because there is no earthquake in Malaysia.

    Hence you are also a party to be blamed for awarding P.Eng to undeserved engineers or Bumi engineers for that matter.

  • Protectionism  - Finance Manager, FCCA, CA, CFP

    The protectionism policy to nurture Bumi contractors have definitely not met its original objective.

    For over 52 years since gaining independence from the British, there would have been at least 2 full generation of Bumi contractors being groomed(assuming the average guy work 26 years in this sector since age 20+) and the second generation would have been able to compete internationally.

    Export our Bumi-contractors skills, expertise. The global benchmark just does not adjust lower meet to local standards, as the building will have to stand for 50+ years.

    Look at the KT Stadium, the leaking Parliament ceiling, just to recall a few.

  • Loh KH

    Zali,

    You mentioned that bumi cannot compete because the whole sector already control by the non bumi. Does that gives you justification to stop trying? Tak serik di makan tajak, esok lusa ke bendang juga.

    I am a small businessman myself. Frankly I tell you if you got no money, no matter what race you are, no supplier going to entertain you.

    If you think this non bumi charging you too high, then keep on looking for cheaper alternative. No is just not the answer.

  • K S Ong  - Hands on necessary particularly in construction

    As usual, Bumiputeras will be quick to point to the so-called control by Chinese suppliers of construction materials. Chinese businessmen go for the money, so if there is any discrimination in terms of price, any novice regardless of race has to pay the price of learning the trade and source out the best prices for the necessary materials. Even Chinese bosses who are content with sitting in the air-conditioned offices will have to pay the price of being duped by their employees.

    Just the other day, I was discussing with my wife about some of the up and coming businessmen - supplier of fertilizers (started as sundry shop, still does) who still drive a lorry to deliver to customers; contract palm fruit harvester who now owns more than 100 acres, who still drive a lorry when necessary; and a few years ago, my friend drove an empty bus (though one-off occasion) and his father as attendant when they were director and chairman of a public listed company then!

    Such hands-on entrepreneurs deserved to be successful and we don't feel envious over their success.

  • Anonymous  - re: Finance Manager, FCCA, CA, CFP
    Loh KH wrote:
    Zali,

    You mentioned that bumi cannot compete because the whole sector already control by the non bumi. Does that gives you justification to stop trying? Tak serik di makan tajak, esok lusa ke bendang juga.

    I am a small businessman myself. Frankly I tell you if you got no money, no matter what race you are, no supplier going to entertain you.

    If you think this non bumi charging you too high, then keep on looking for cheaper alternative. No is just not the answer.


    no, i'm not telling stop trying but look at the real world and i'm not saying that the are no good bumi contractors and i personally knew a few of them but if really tomorrow they close up these quota things, a lot of real bumi contractor will suffer.the real culprit is 'bumi know who'contractor who hijack the contract and pass it to non bumi to execute since non bumi can give them better profit margin due to reason i stated earlier. at the end it back to square one.but please answer me honestly, if there are two contractors, one bumi and one non bumi tender for say drainage projects from non bumi developer with similar pricing who will get the contracts? if u can answer this sincerely and honestly, then i might consider my view.
    let the playing field at least almost level for everybody to play fairly.

Write comment
Your Contact Details:
Comment:
[b] [i] [u] [url] [quote] [code] [img]   
Security
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.