blah,blah,blah,blah,apa ini? new version of Manglish ah? see what 56 years of dumbing down of the education system in favour of 1Race in Msia does to you? can't even speaking the proper English; welcome to the 21st century
apart from the apostrophe,I can't really follow what the heck you guys are talking about in your precise or is it something else?
c'mon CPI, what the heck are you doing?

Why did I [over]react in that way to that recent apostrophe? Well, it’s a bit late now to complain, but .. .. .. I refer to that other forum on “Islamic State: Which Version: Who’s Responsibility?” in Subang Jaya on Nov 3. Either “Who’s Responsible?” or “Whose Responsibility?” but not “Who’s responsibility?”

Is multiculturalism rhetoric’s a contributing factor in not addressing the real racism issues in Malaysia?

Sorry to get pedantic, grumpy. But please, “rhetorics”, not “rhetoric’s”. Yet the apostrophe is the least of the matter. It’s the central substantive point that’s the big worry. People really need to be, and to make it, clear what they are talking about, how they are using words/concepts, before they leap into dramatic statements about multiculturalism, and start suggesting that it is or may be a legitimate cause of bigotry. Some uses/[mis]appropriations of “multiculturalism” may lend themselves to that sort of thing. But there are many senses, more usual and generally recognized senses, of the term that do not. Allowing, even assisting, this sort of glib sloganeering to be promoted, and enjoy uncontested circulation, does not do damage simply to the term “multiculturalism” [whatever it may mean]. Far worse, it encourages, “licenses”, all sorts of outright, ignorant bigotry [which is what you are all presumably trying to prevent or discourage]. That is far worse. Important philosophical and basic social theory concepts must be handled with care. There must be some respect for competent expertise — especially when one has in mind the unleashing of potentially fateful argument about basic, and basically contested, ideas in a deeply troubled and divided society, one facing the prospect of painful eruption, such as Malaysia today. Is that what people wish to detonate? I do not say that these things should not be discussed. They must be. But they must be treated carefully and intelligently, with the benefit of the insights, and fastidious intellectual care and conceptual clarity, of the best expertise. Amateur diagnosis and surgery, in this case as in others, can easily do untold harm.